[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BBC Delivery Standards
John Sprung wrote:
> Actually, Robert, you were right the first time.
> 14x9 is a dismal kludge. The problem is that TV sets of both
> aspect ratios have to be served with the same programs. The
> best way I've found to do that is to work entirely in 1.33:1,
> and after the show is done, extract 1.78 from within it using
> a tape to tape tilt and scan pass. I'll be busy for the next
> couple weeks, but thereafter I can show and tell how it works.
>From reading the actual BBC article, I don't think 14x9 TV sets are
anticipated - they only mention use of a 14x9 PICTURE SAFETY area for
production. Seems like a cautious measure designed to avoid too much
widescreen picture truncation on 4x3 sets. If I read it right.
+ Robert Lund | "So many good ones, and so many bad ones; +
+ lundo at interport.net | that's what you get for trying." +
+ New York City | Dutch Schultz, last words +
Thanks to Robin Castle for support in 1999.
No advertising/marketing allowed on the main TIG. Contact rob at alegria.com
anonymous messaging now at http://www.alegria.com/HyperNews/get/ubique.html
1032 subscribers in 41 countries on Wed Feb 17 19:19:38 CST 1999
subscribe/unsubscribe with that Subject: to telecine-request at alegria.com
complete information on the TIG website http://www.alegria.com/tig3/