[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "INTERNET:telecine at alegria.com" <telecine at alegria.com>
- Subject: Re: 2000
- From: Dick Hobbs <Dick_Hobbs at compuserve.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 07:45:00 -0500
- Organization: Altruistic Intentions, Hollywood, CA
- Phone-number: +1 213 464 6266
- Reply-To: Rob Lingelbach <rob at alegria.com>
- Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 09:02:47 -0800
- Resent-From: rob at alegria.com (Rob Lingelbach)
- Resent-Message-Id: <E0xhHRH-0000WT-00 at sun.alegria.com>
- Resent-Sender: Rob Lingelbach <rob at sun.alegria.com>
- Resent-To: mhon at praia.alegria.com
"Cutesy features" they may be, but a lot of people appreciated little
things like being able to give a sensible name to a document, rather than=
being constrained to eight characters, no spaces and a meaningless (to Jo=
Public) three-letter extension.
Martin is right in implying that Windows 95 and NT are now really rather
good, but that has only happened because of the existence of the Mac.
Without it, we would probably still be lumbered with MS-DOS, or regarding=
Unix as a positive development. With its influence, we can all enjoy
desktop publishing, the Web, ProTools, the Pogle user interface, and a
whole lot more good stuff.
The chances are that - due to colossal mismanagement and even larger egos=
at Cupertino - Apple and the Mac will be lost to us, probably around the
time that old PCs fall over trying to make sense of year 00. For those of=
us who love our Macs - mainly people like me who really could not care le=
what is going on inside our computers - that is sad news.
PS 'Are we saying that all of those IBM (and others) mainframes running
little operating systems like VMS, etc. were not "sufficiently well
conceived"'? If their designers had not spotted the year 2000 coming pret=
soon after the 1999, then yes, I would say that they were not sufficientl=