[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Telecine at sun.alegria.com
- Subject: FWD>SGI
- From: "Martin Parsons" <martin at mill.co.uk>
- Date: 4 Nov 1997 16:19:40 +0100
- Cc: "Dave Levy" <davel at postie.mill>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 08:32:32 -0800
- Resent-From: telecine at sun.alegria.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"mfLm2.A.Z0B.O40X0" at sun>
- Resent-Sender: telecine-request at sun.alegria.com
- Resent-To: multiple recipients of <telecine at sun.alegria.com>
Mail*LinkĘ SMTP FWD>SGI
To further the debate on SGI v. NT platforms I would like to forward my colleague's experience with both.
I am sure several of you out there know Dave "A84" Levy.
Date: 4/11/97 4:12 pm
From: Dave Levy
In the Mill 3D department we have roughly even numbers of 500MHz Alpha NT boxes
and R10K Indigo2s.
The NT boxes are around one third the price of the SGI boxes, are cheaper to
get hardware maintenance 20K vs. 2K !!!! and network just fine (at last) over
NFS (Intergraph software).
They all run softimage just fine and I go home every night. Incidentally it's
the same price on each platform.
HOWEVER: The NT philosophy of user-centric network mounts which only are active
during a login session means we have to administer the NT boxes individually
and in person. This is due to the fact that services such as mental ray which
they are perfect for have to be resident locally as they can operate in a slave
mode even when the box has no user logged in. This causes major pain as I write
a lot of custom shaders which must be installed on each NT box.
The no rlogin and no multiple user login sucks, I can fix anyones SGI from home
but the NT boxes need a droid peering at the desktop.
We are more annoyed at SGI shooting themselves in the foot with overpriced
machines, overpriced maintenance, not wonderful graphics, not particularly fast
CPUs and a general arrogance normally associated with the likes of a particular
Newbury based company.
If SGI feel that NT on an Intel box is a neat idea then they have lost the plot
entirely. So here is my suggestion.
1. Dump MIPS.
2. Choose Alpha.
3. Port Irix to alpha.
4. Use emulation for old MIPS binaries.
5. Get real with pricing and maintenance.
6. Dump alias. Softimage is your best ally.
If unix boxes were only 20% more we wouldn't even look at NT
Dave Levy davel at tjfx.co.uk || davel at mill.co.uk
tjfx Ltd, The Mill, 40-41 Great Marlborough Street, London
W1V 1DA Tel:0171 287 4041 Fax: 0171 287 8393
------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by mailmac.mill.co.uk with SMTP;4 Nov 1997 16:11:20 +0100
Received: from spike.tjfx.co.uk (spike.tjfx.co.uk [184.108.40.206]) by postie.mill.co.uk (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA14770 for <martin at postie.mill.co.uk>; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 16:12:37 GMT
Received: from tjfx.tjfx.co.uk (tjfx.tjfx.co.uk [220.127.116.11]) by spike.tjfx.co.uk (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA10025 for < at spike.tjfx.co.uk:martin at postie.mill.co.uk>; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 16:12:01 GMT
Received: (from davel at localhost) by tjfx.tjfx.co.uk (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA01353 for martin at postie; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 16:12:00 GMT
From: "Dave Levy" <davel at tjfx.co.uk>
Message-Id: <9711041612.ZM1351 at tjfx.tjfx.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 16:11:59 +0000
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: martin at postie.mill.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
thanks to South London Filter for support of the TIG in 1997
TIG subscriber count is 882 on Tue Nov 4 08:32:15 PST 1997
visit the TIG website at http://www.alegria.com/telecinehome.html
mailinglist digest available.... unsubscribe via a message to
'telecine-request at alegria.com' with Subject: unsubscribe