[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (Fwd) TIG Re: film look vs video look




>The progressive scan nature of the image meant, for the most part, no
>sawtoothing on diagonal lines,  especially when the image was moving, in
>addition to very little motion blur overall.  Lack of motion blur is, in my
>opinion, one of the major factors in making video look like video.

That's why electronic cameras such as the Polaroid version you described
should oversample in the temporal domain so that motion blur (temporal
integration) can be controlled. If you do data reduction in the camera
system you would also then control the degree of motion blur (shutter angle
vs. fstop vs. film speed vs. lighting) at the camera as it is done now. If
the full data stream is recorded this is then a post production option.

James Fancher
Chief Science Officer
Pacific Ocean Post
730 Arizona Ave.
Santa Monica, CA 90401

310 458-3300 voice
310 394-6852 fax
310 319-1750 direct line